|
Opening
Statement by Mr. K. Y. Amoako, Executive Secretary,
Economic Commission for Africa at the Conference of
African Ministers of Finance, Planning and Economic
Development, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 01 June 2003
"Towards
Greater Policy Coherence and Mutual Accountability for
Development Effectiveness"
Your Excellency, Trevor
Manuel, Minister of Finance of South Africa and
Chairperson of the Commission
Your Excellency, Amara Essy, Interim Chairperson of the
Commission of the African Union
Honourable Ministers and Governors
Distinguished Delegates
Ladies and Gentlemen
It is with great pleasure
that I once again welcome you to Addis Ababa and ECA.
You will recall
that in Algiers in May 2001, we agreed to merge the
Economic Commission for Africa conferences of Ministers of
Finance and Ministers of Economic Development and Planning
into a single Conference to improve our efficiency and
impact. In Johannesburg last year, you urged that Africa's
key regional institutions strategically time their
meetings to better influence international fora. As part
of our response, we agreed to synchronize this Conference
with the African Development Bank's Annual Meetings. I
would like to thank my brother, Omar Kabbaj, for the
excellent collaboration of ABD and for making this
possible.
Honourable
Ministers and Governors
Before
speaking to the issues on today's agenda, allow me to
briefly reflect on the work and increasing importance of
this Conference.
As
part of ECA's reforms begun in 1996, we proposed some
changes to the legislative machinery that guided the
Commission's work. We argued that quality was better than
quantity, and that we should strive to make all our
meetings and conferences substantive and strategic, and to
tie them more closely to Africa's development agenda.
Based on this, we radically transformed the Conference of
Ministers, making it more interactive, issues-driven and
outcome-oriented.
Now,
seven years later, these conferences have become a vital
event on Africa's development calendar and in the
considerations of our development partners. Recent
conferences fully evidence this.
In
Addis Ababa in May 1999, against the backdrop of a
global financial crisis, you called for the HIPC
initiative to be restructured; you asked G7 countries to
completely cancel debts arising from bilateral aid for the
poorest countries; you proposed that the IMF refinance
HIPC through gold sales; you insisted that debt relief
should not come at the expense of ODA; you pushed for
expanded aid flows; you highlighted the importance of
improved African ownership of development programmes and
the need to strengthen institutional aid delivery
mechanisms; and you stressed the need to accelerate trade
and investment as an important part of financing
development.
In
Addis Ababa in November 2000, you again raised
concerns about HIPC, and restated your positions on ODA
and trade; you held an important discussion on the
international financial architecture and concluded that it
needed reform. At that meeting, I proposed a new Global
Compact for Africa's Recovery, as an outcome of the LDCs
conference as well as the then upcoming Financing for
Development Conference. You mandated me to prepare a
detailed Compact, along with proposals on how to implement
it, to be presented at the next Conference.
In
Algiers in May 2001, you set the course to merge the
Millennium Plan for Africa's Recovery and the Omega Plan
into a single African Initiative. Algiers deepened the
concepts of African ownership of the development process
and speaking with one voice in a new relationship with
Africa's development partners. Your Ministerial Statement
forcefully advised that the 4th WTO Ministerial be a
'Development Round' and it underscored the need for Africa
to accelerate regional integration to increase its chances
of benefiting from globalization.
In
Johannesburg in October 2002, you discussed steps
needed to implement the New Partnership for Africa's
Development (NEPAD). There you proposed concrete ways to
move NEPAD forward. Your Ministerial Statement stressed
aid effectiveness; proposed improved economic
policymaking; endorsed unleashing the private sector and
liberalizing trade; called for improving Africa's
representation in trade talks; endorsed the African Peer
Review Mechanism (APRM) as an African-owned tool for peer
learning and self-monitoring; recommended the principle of
transformed partnerships underpinned by African ownership
and mutual accountability; and called for faster debt
relief for HIPC and non-HIPC countries.
Honourable
Ministers and Governors
There
is an added weight of responsibility in these Conferences
as together we have learned to move from recommendations
to action.
Many
of the far-reaching proposals from your Conference in 1999
subsequently found their way onto the agenda of the G7
Summit in Cologne, Germany, as well as to the Development
Assistance Committee of the Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD).
At
the Monterrey Financing for Development meeting in March
2002, your proposals on debt, aid and trade resonated with
the Consensus. At the Lusaka Summit your painstaking work
in advocating for a single African initiative bore fruit
in NEPAD and the African Union.
In
Doha, the fourth WTO Ministerial was declared a
development round, just as you requested in your 2001
Conference. In Kananaskis, positions on a new Compact
underpinned the deliberations as well as the G8's detailed
Action Plan formulated in response to NEPAD.
And
shortly after your Conference in 2002, the NEPAD Heads of
State and Government Implementation Committee, meeting in
Abuja, took up the mutual accountability issue, which you
had previously raised. They requested ECA and the OECD to
develop an institutional framework for monitoring progress
in this area.
Your
encouragement that we pursue proposals for a new
relationship between Africa and its development partners
has led to a major paradigm shift in the development
discourse. There is now widespread acceptance of: a
Compact based on African ownership and leadership; Mutual
commitment to meeting shared goals and outcomes; joint
responsibility for monitoring progress towards these
goals; and the need to establish a mechanism for tracking
progress.
In
short, these Conferences have repeatedly proven to be
valuable fora for advocating an African-owned and
African-led agenda, and for ensuring that Africa's united
voice is respected in global development
policymaking.
Honourable
Ministers and Governors
This
year's Conference is particularly significant for a number
of reasons. One major reason is that we are meeting at the
same time as the G8 Summit is taking place in Evian,
France. Many of the issues we will discuss today are also
on the table at Evian. The Summit will discuss the
implementation of the G8 Action Plan and a number of key
issues in the context of NEPAD, among them Peace and
Security, Water and Sanitation, HIV/AIDS, and meeting the
Millennium Development Goals. All in all, we can expect
further support for Africa.
But
clearly, while Evian is another step in the right
direction, a number of fundamental issues of concern to
Africa will remain unresolved. Our discussion today of
mutual accountability and policy coherence is intended to
accelerate progress on the unfinished agenda of market
access, ODA, debt relief and commodity price
stabilization.
Let
me briefly turn to the issues on our agenda.
Your
recent conferences have been instrumental in ensuring that
aid effectiveness is at the heart of discussions between
Africa and its development partners. As we seek to advance
mutual accountability and policy coherence, the emphasis
is increasingly on concrete mechanisms to monitor
progress. To this end, we at ECA, together with the OECD,
have proposed a joint review of development
effectiveness to enable Africa and its partners to
take stock and monitor performance. The NEPAD Heads of
State and Government Implementation Committee asked us to
prepare the proposal, and have endorsed our progress. What
we have in mind is a mutual review conducted every two
years, based on reports produced by ECA and the OECD
Secretariat. Indicators will need to be developed and data
will need to be culled on the areas of greatest concern to
Africa. We envisage the report being presented every two
years to this Conference, and believe that this will
further strengthen the practical relevance of these
meetings. Your views today will be critical in shaping and
finalizing the joint review process.
We
cannot talk about aid effectiveness without talking about the
IMF and its role in Africa. The IMF has been, and will
continue to be, an important actor in Africa's
development. I welcome the Fund's current review of its
instruments, policies and procedures. At our third 'Big
Table' meeting in January this year, those of you who
attended will recall the discussion on the role the IMF
should play in low-income countries. To contribute to the
process, we agreed that a special Big Table on this
subject would be convened later this year, prior to the
World Bank/IMF Annual Meetings. Many of you serve as
Governors of the World Bank and IMF. And we are joined
here today by a number of Executive Directors. So today's
discussion will contribute in many ways to the upcoming
Annual and Development Committee meetings.
I
think we can all agree that despite the considerable
progress signaled by our development partners endorsement
of the HIPC initiative, the debt burden continues to weigh
heavily on Africa. Even with its limitations, HIPC has
made clear that debt relief is a viable instrument for
financing Africa's development. But what I believe we must
do now is to think beyond HIPC, and consider what comes
next in our collective struggle to manage this heavy
economic burden. The need to further the debt relief
agenda has been cited by many African leaders, including
President Wade of Senegal, at the suggestion of whom ECA
will convene, in September of this year, an African
Experts Group Meeting on debt relief. Building on this
meeting, and consistent with our efforts to ensure that
Africa's agenda is thoughtfully and thoroughly represented
in international fora, I am proposing today that ECA
convenes, in early 2004, an International Conference of
African Debt Relief. I believe that we can, and must, take
the initiative to design the policies, instruments and
initiatives that can constitute the next step in the
international community's efforts to reduce Africa's debt
burden. I urge all you Honourable Ministers gathered here
today to lend your support to the proposed Conference.
Four
years ago in this room Chairperson, UNAIDS Executive
Director Peter Piot and I engaged you on HIV/AIDS. We
spoke of the emerging impacts of the pandemic on Africa's
development. Today it is far clearer that HIV/AIDS is
causing devastating damage to our economies. Projections
show that in our most severely afflicted countries, GDP
could fall significantly by 2020. Nearly a million African
students a year lose their teachers to HIV/AIDS. And,
according to FAO, 7 million agricultural workers have
already died of AIDS and at least 16 million more will die
by 2020. What these figures show is that enhancing
development effectiveness must include mitigating the
scourge of HIV/AIDS. That is why the Secretary-General of
the United Nations has asked me to chair a Commission on
HIV/AIDS and Governance, that will, among other things,
develop tools for policymakers to quickly grapple with,
and hopefully reduce the impacts of the pandemic. Your
advice on the issues of greatest priority for this work
and on the right macro-policy responses to HIV/AIDS will
be welcome.
Chairperson
Honourable Ministers and Governors
How
will today's discussion make a difference in the coming
weeks and months? I have already mentioned the Annual
Meetings of the World Bank and IMF, which will take place
in Dubai in September, and the next meetings of the
Development Committee. There, the role of the IMF will
surely be discussed and our views will be heard. Also in
September, the 5th WTO Ministerial Round will take place
in Cancun, Mexico. We must make sure that Africa's
unfinished trade agenda -- including the unfettering of
market access, protection of intellectual property rights
and removal of non-tariff barriers -- is addressed as part
of the discussion on policy coherence. Finally in October
of this year, the third Tokyo International Conference on
African Development (TICAD III), as was the case in
previous TICADs, will place emphasis on social
development, private sector participation and good
governance in Africa. The deliberations of this Conference
of Ministers of Finance, Planning and Economic Development
could make an important contribution to the outcome of
TICAD III.
Time
is short, Chairperson, and I will not venture to review
other matters since your experts have gone through them in
some detail. Indeed, I cannot conclude my statement
without expressing my sincere gratitude to the Committee
of Experts for their exceptional work. I would also give a
special vote of thanks to the Chairman of the Committee of
Experts, who will shortly be presenting to you the report
of your Experts. The efficient and substantive way in
which he presided over the proceedings was simply
exceptional.
Honorable Ministers
It is a full agenda. I thank
you for being here and I look forward very much to your
views and recommendations.
|